Sustainable Conservation:
Putting Natural Capitalism to Work The world's burgeoning population (the United States alone will see its population grow by an additional 120 million by 2050) demands both abundant goods and services and a high quality environment. Increasingly, the capacity of nature to produce essential services -- the resources produced by the environment that we often take for granted such as clean water and air, soil productivity, pollination, scenic beauty, and many more -- is becoming strained. At the same time, demand for nature's services is growing. In the face of this growing scarcity, it has become clear that there is an urgent need to think strategically about how to design new policies for conservation that can engage both public policy and private enterprise in new ways to conserve and enhance environmental services.
In much of the industrialized world, conservation has focused on public land systems, tax subsidies and regulatory incentives for forest management, and private land protection by philanthropically inclined landowners. Rising raw material prices helped provide incentives to private forestland owners to manage their lands for forestry purposes, but other ecosystem services produced by those forests and wild lands went unpriced. Those services provided by nature for free are the essential life support systems on which all life depends and the earth’s economies rely. Yet, because they remain unpriced in the marketplace, they are subject to over-exploitation in a manner that has been described as the "tragedy of the commons" (a metaphor used to illustrate the conflict between individual interests and the common good, popularized by Garrett Hardin in his 1968 Science article of the same name).
Absent compensation for the services produced by open space and forests, landowners respond to market forces that do provide compensation. Increasingly, higher value for land can be obtained by converting it from extensive landuses to real estate and other more intensive use development. The values of clean air, water, wildlife, and recreation simply don't compete on the same basis. The resulting landuse changes are alarming in much of the United States and place greater stress on current conservation policies to maintain the ecosystem services that society demands. The challenge of protection is enormous. Mark Shaffer, J. Michael Scott, and Frank Casey writing in the journal BioScience estimate that to protect the remaining stocks of biological diversity in the United States, a comprehensive system of habitat conservation areas of approximately 236.4 million acres of land would be required in addition to the lands already in public ownership. The cost of such a system of protected areas, if all were held in conservation easements, would be approximately $400 billion if easements could be purchased at the current average cost of approximately $1,700 per acre. That compares to the 6,225,225 acres of land protected by local and regional land trusts as of the year 2000.
The Workshop
The organizers of this workshop came together around a common understanding of the need for new approaches to conservation and environmental protection. What we are doing today simply does not suffice to meet conservation needs at the landscape scale, nor do our current efforts effectively incorporate working lands over the long run. Existing conservation efforts related to forestry and agricultural lands need to be maintained and, if possible, expanded. But significant new infusions of money into existing programs and efforts alone, as evidenced by the impact on conservation resulting from recent farm bills, will not likely turn the tide. Fortunately, research conducted over the past thirty years has resulted in technologies, such as GPS and sophisticated computer modeling, that create opportunities for efforts deemed infeasible in the past, such as market-based approaches on a landscape-scale.
On May 18-20, 2005, 100 people from around the country and representing a range of disciplines came to Washington, D.C. to participate in a meeting designed to conceive and discuss landscape-scale conservation strategies that rely on new kinds of public and private policies and initiatives. Key to these discussions was the goal of developing a better understanding of how effective markets for ecosystem services might be developed, how those markets could be combined with existing strategies for conservation to bring about larger scale protection of wildland and habitats, and how markets for those services might provide new sources of revenue to compensate private landowners and create incentives to protect open space.
The emerging agenda (for action, research, and policy change) could engage the conservation community over the next 5 to 10 years. Outcomes include articulation of key market-based strategies for conservation and development of regional-scale pilot projects to test and document outcomes; an assessment tool for federal and other public land management agencies to begin to better measure the value of ecosystem services produced by public lands in the United States; and an agenda for policy reform to support conservation of biological diversity and to enhance the production of necessary ecosystem services.
The workshop was convened by the following organizations:
American Forests;
Winrock International;
Southern Environmental Law Center;
Environmental Defense – Center for Conservation Initiatives; and
Innovative and Emerging Challenges Division, National Center for Environmental Economics, United States Environmental Protection Agency
The Agenda